How much does an architect charge to design a home in Austin, TX?

If you are interested in working with an architect to design your new home or remodel-addition, you’re probably wondering “How much does an architect charge to design a home?” Budget is an important consideration when thinking about creating your dream home. So it’s understandable that you want to know how much to allocate for architectural fees. However, as common as this question is, it is a very tough one to answer.

Simply because, every client and project is unique! It’s a bit like asking, “How long is a piece of string?” A string can be any length depending on what you need it for. Likewise, an architect’s fees will vary greatly based on what you hire them to do.

How Much Does an Architect Really Cost?

A quick internet search will give you results that are confusing, inaccurate, and misleading. You can find average hourly rates or estimated costs for a type of project, but you really cannot count on these to determine how much an architect will charge for your specific project. In my professional opinion, they are often extremely low and unrealistic.

Also, it’s challenging to talk about money in specifics. Topics like our fees and cost of our projects are all hush-hush. In fact, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) and some architecture boards forbid us from discussing our fees at all!

A quick introduction

I am a licensed architect with more than 20 years of experience designing custom homes in Austin, TX. I started my own firm, Architecture By George in 2016. Before that, I worked for a couple of renowned Austin architecture firms designing high-end and luxury custom homes.

I have been the lead architect on residential projects of varied scope and complexity. During my career in custom residential architecture, my projects have included everything from modest remodels and additions to multimillion dollar luxury custom homes.

All that to say that I have extensive experience working under different fee structures and speak from first-hand knowledge.

Even with the complexity of the question, “How much does an architect charge?” and the challenges associated with discussing architect’s fees in a general sense, I want to give you a general idea about how architects charge for the services they provide. I hope this article will help you understand how architect’s approach their fees and help you know what to expect when you contact an architect for help with your home project.

How Do Architects Determine Their Fees?

Architects use a variety of factors to determine their fees and ultimately what they charge clients for each project. You have to understand that architecture is a highly skilled profession, with creativity and technical knowledge going hand-in-hand. It all comes down to how much time an architect spends on your project - understanding the project needs and the client needs, designing, revising the design, producing drawings, solving problems, negotiating the challenges and doing project management - time spent in meetings, coordinating consultants, working with the city, etc.

Architect’s fee also depends on 1) the architect, 2) the project, and 3) the client.

the architect

Experienced, skilled architects who have a track record of excellence for architectural design often charge more than those who are new to the industry. As with all things, you will pay more for high-value brands with a great reputation. Similarly, large architecture firms with big teams may charge more.

When determining how much an architect charges to design a house, the expected end result plays a big role in the final fee. Some architects focus on smaller, simpler projects while others offer bespoke luxury and unique designs. The complexity and creativity that goes into a project also plays a role in fees. 

So too does expertise in an architectural style, energy efficiency, etc, which also coincides with the services they provide. A simple floor plan and elevation drawing will cost much less than those with included project management, permit handling, interior design, energy analysis, and more. Increased responsibility and liability associated with the overall construction project can also raise prices.

the project

The bulk of the architect’s fee depends on the scope of the project. Is it a simple new home design or a complex addition? Other factors to take into consideration include the size of the house, any accessory buildings like casitas or boat houses, the location of the property, and the complexity and uniqueness of the work. Tough sites with unique challenges lead to increased costs. The more complex the project, the more the architect will charge. Sometimes, more documentation is needed to satisfy the complex Austin, TX zoning codes and ordinances.

the client

While the above two elements affect architect fees more directly, specific interests or needs of the clients can also contribute. For example, if the client requires more frequent meetings and updates and want a higher level of involvement from start to finish, the architect will charge more. If they want many iterations of the design to consider, the fees will likewise increase. This makes sense as every interaction, design iteration, and deliverable takes more time, effort, and skill.

Common Architecture Fee Structures Explained

The following methods are commonly used by architects to determine total fees for their services. These vary widely depending on the specifics mentioned above.

percentage fee

The percentage fee method is perhaps the most common. It involves charging a % of the total construction cost for the project that the architect designs. It can range anywhere from 5% to 20% depending on the factors discussed above.

This approach is most often used when the architect provides full architectural services for large, complex, or highly custom projects. For example, an architect may use the percentage fee structure for designing a custom luxury home. If let’s say, the architect is only providing a basic set of plans, then the % will be on the low end of the range, whereas if the architect was providing a detailed set of drawings and specifications, along with a full suite of services such as project management, interior design, coordination of all the consultants, etc., then their fees would be on the higher end of the range.  This aligns the architect’s services with overall project value.

fixed fee

Architects often propose fixed fees for well-defined, fairly simple, and straightforward projects. This also works well for long-term clients with a clear understanding of what to expect. For example, a flat fee might make sense when an architect designs a spec home on a flat lot for a builder or developer. The site does not pose many challenges, and working with an industry professional requires less time. The architect typically has more leeway on the design, meetings go quickly, decisions are made fast, and there are fewer challenges or complexities.

For a homeowner client, some architects may still propose a fixed fee, but this is generally more challenging due to the higher number of unknowns. It works best when they offer a limited scope of services, such as a specific number of drawings or construction documents only. I’ve never done a custom home project where the scope hasn’t changed. Remodel-additions frequently present unanticipated challenges and some clients prefer a more hands-on approach, which also adds to the complexity.

The advantages of this fee structure are that the architect and client know how much the fees are at the outset, which helps with budget planning.  This fee structure offers both absolute transparency and less stress overall. Both the architect and the client clearly know what is expected from them and that their responsibility is limited to the initial agreement.

This lack of flexibility, however, is also a disadvantage for some home design and remodeling projects. If the client wants any additional services or changes, they should expect to pay an additional fee. If the project runs into unforeseen issues, the results may be similar. If an architect chooses a fixed fee at the start, but changes occur over the course of the project, they may not get fully compensated for their efforts.

hourly fee

 Architectural design and all the services that go into a successful project involve many complex elements that need skilled, professional attention. An hourly rate helps the architect remain more flexible and adapt to the dynamic nature of any residential construction, renovation, or remodeling project. This also allows for reasonable adjustments to overall cost due to specific client needs or unforeseen challenges that arise.

An hourly rate provides a high degree of flexibility and transparency, and is therefore my fee structure of choice at Architecture By George. I find that it keeps things clear for clients and allows for more transparent expectations of final costs. I offer a breakdown of the time spent on their project. Working together, the client and architect can prioritize budget decisions and make informed choices based on the time spent on each aspect of the project.

The primary disadvantages of an hourly fee structure include uncertainty and the need for more in-depth budget management. It is difficult to determine the total overall cost of the project before completion. Clients may need to speak up more about their limits in order to ensure the project stays within their desired budget range.

per square foot

People who are somewhat familiar with the building and construction world, such as builders and developers, may expect architects to charge for their services based on square footage of the structure or addition. While internet sources can put average costs anywhere from $2 to $5, these are vague numbers that do not reflect the factors described above. 

I was baffled when I first learned about this fee basis. If the architect’s fee is tied to the square feet, why not design a bloated house? I personally hate this method because it treats a highly skilled service like a commodity rather than a intellectual, creative, and professional service. 

No reputable architect will charge the same per square foot price for a simple addition to a home as they would for a custom luxury dwelling with many unique features and elements.

combination fee structures

It’s quite common to use a combination of the above fee structures during various phases of design. For example, the architect may charge an hourly fee for initial consultations or the preliminary design phase and then switch to a % fee or fixed fee structure when producing construction documents.

How Much Does an Architect Cost for a Remodel-Addition?

When determining architect costs for an addition or partial remodel, you have to take the intricacies of the existing structure into account. It is much simpler to build from a foundation up than it is to fit an addition into a building that already exists. Every home has its own unique structures, materials, and designs. An architect has to work with those things and create a seamless addition or change that works with the entire property.

in conclusion

Understanding how much an architect charges and how they determine their fee structure gives you important information about what fee structure you feel comfortable with, who to hire, planning your home design or remodeling project. It is an important thing to know when choosing an architect that best suits your needs. Know that it is always the architect’s decision how they want to charge based on their previous experience, skills, and specialties.

Ask questions about your chosen architect’s fee structure and get estimates for your specific project details. Understand that quality results deserve proper investment. You do not want to risk your dream home or existing property to just anyone. Working with an architect represents a real investment in your current happiness and future. The choice is ultimately about shared priorities and compatibility.

If your project is in Austin, TX, and you are wondering how much it costs to hire an architect, please schedule a free call with me. I am eager to discuss your unique project, share my expertise with you, and provide insights into architectural fees. I can create a custom proposal for you and help you understand the process, costs, and possibilities.

Cheers,

Sharon

Modern vs Contemporary Design - Clearing Up Common Misconceptions

As a custom home architect specializing in contemporary design, one of the most frequent misunderstandings I encounter has to do with architectural styles - namely, the difference between “modern” and “contemporary” style homes.

Many clients come to me looking for a “modern style house,” only to realize that after discussing their vision in more depth, what they are truly after is a contemporary-style residence. 

The confusion of verbiage is understandable - we use “modern” to describe anything current or en vogue (“modern man”, “modern family”, “modern life”). Even home magazines and architecture articles often use terms interchangeably when discussing design and showcasing homes. But when it comes to architectural styles, ‘modern’ and ‘contemporary’ refer to distinct design eras, ideologies, and aesthetics, especially to an architect.

Sure, it’s semantics - but is it? 

Why does it matter how you describe your style preferences?  How do you choose between a modern or contemporary architectural style for your custom home? 

At a minimum, you might miscommunicate with your architect as you try to describe your abstract vision of your ideal home.  But most importantly, without understanding what defines each style - their origins, philosophies, visual trademarks, and functionality considerations - you risk a) hiring an architect who specializes in an architectural style that does not reflect your personal values, style, or personality and b) making design decisions that are unsuitable for your needs and your lifestyle.

With this blog post, my goal is to demystify modern versus contemporary home design styles so you can make aesthetically and functionally-aligned decisions for your own home. By understanding the contrasts, you gain clarity and vocabulary to communicate your custom home aspirations with your partner, design professionals, and builder. 

Let’s explore what sets contemporary architecture apart from its modern architectural predecessor.  Think about what resonates with you as you envision your dream home!

defining distinct architectural eras

Modern Architecture: A 20th Century Design Revolution

Modern architecture originated in the early 20th century alongside a progressive social movement which revolutionized art, literature, and many cultural aspects of society.  Modernism rejected traditional rules and embraced a new expression, experimentation, enlightenment, and social equality. The modern architectural movement was pioneered by leading architects like Frank Lloyd Wright, Walter Gropius, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Le Corbusier, to name a few.  

Modernist architects sought to reinvent design, focusing on functionality and efficiency of space, using new industrial materials and construction methods made possible by technological innovations, advancements in engineering, and mass production. For the first time, there was a universal design language.

Key hallmarks of modern architectural style are:

• Time Period: Early to mid/late 1900s.  So in fact, the modern architectural style is as much a "historical style" as classical style or any other style of the past.

• Philosophy & Ideology: Reflecting progress and equality, embracing technology and innovation. Rejecting historical styles and ornamentation in favor of minimalism - “Less is more”;  Focusing on function and comfort through pure forms - "Form follows function" - Louis Sullivan. 

• Character & Materials: Simple, minimal, asymmetrical, clean lines that emphasize horizontality or verticality, strong geometrical shapes, cantilevers, flat roofs, and open floor plans enabling larger spaces. Celebrated form, space, light, and the honest expression of materials and their capabilities. Abundant use of mass-produced industrial materials like concrete, steel, and glass. Floor to ceiling glass allows ample natural light, airflow, and connection to the outdoors.

• Contrast to previous architecture:  Modern style was a conscious departure from the elitist and opulent spaces of the previous era of Victorian architecture, characterized by symmetry, brick exteriors, steep pitch roofs, intricate stained glass windows, sash set windows with small panes of glass or divided lites; decorative moldings, ornamental carvings and details that showcased craftsmanship and wealth.  Interiors were rich and layered, just like their couture - wallpaper with bold patterns and florals, rich colors and jewel tones, natural materials like silk and marble; ostentatious draperies, etc.  

• Famous Examples of Modern style residential architecture: Fallingwater by Frank Lloyd Wright, Farnsworth House by Mies van der Rohe, Villa Savoye by Le Corbusier, Glass House by Philip Johnson.

The Mid-Century Modern (MCM) style which became popular in the 1950’s, was in many ways a reaction to the starkness of early modern architecture.  MCM incorporated natural materials like wood, clay tile, and brick to add warmth.  Later, Postmodern and International styles further evolved. 

Contemporary Architecture: Blending Old and New

The contemporary architectural style emerged as a successor to modern architecture at the end of the 20th century and continues to the present day.  Although contemporary architecture does not follow a strict aesthetic style, it seeks to soften some of modernism's austere tendencies while emphasizing simple lines and forms.  

Although many contemporary architects are loath to classify their work as any particular style, they may draw inspiration from historical styles (including the modern style) and often mix visual characteristics of various styles to create a cocktail that fits the current context.  So, while a contemporary home may be of a "modern style," it can also reference a traditional style. 

Hallmarks of contemporary house style:

• Time Period: 1980’s, 2000 to today.  As the name suggests, contemporary style is the current style practiced today. 

• Ideology: Energy efficiency became an important topic after the energy crisis of the early 1970s.  Architects respond to the call to action to be sensitive to the planet, design for the climate, and use fewer resources to build and operate homes. Promotion of vernacular architecture as more appropriate for different climates.  Sustainability and environmental consciousness are at the forefront of the contemporary architectural movement. 

• Character & Materials: An eclectic blend of historical interpretations and progressive design.  Aesthetically, juxtaposition plays an important role in contemporary architecture.  Innovative use of geometric shapes and asymmetrical compositions. Combines elements of modernist style with the softness and warmth of other architectural styles - open floor plans; organic shapes, flowing curves, and rounded forms; sloped roofs; a few ornamental flourishes, variety in design elements and accents contrasted against a plain background. Natural and industrial materials, like wood, recycled materials, concrete, steel, and glass, coexist. Craft is evident in contemporary architecture as seen in woodworking, paneling, steel, and ornamental iron. Symmetry and asymmetry occur at the same time.  Victorian elements such as sash set windows with divided lites, natural materials like marble and limestone, bold colors and patterns, occur in open spaces with large glass sliding doors bathed in natural light. 

why i design contemporary homes…

At my architecture firm, I design contemporary homes for modern families.  Contemporary architecture is about blending the best of historical styles with progressive, sustainable design principles to create beautiful and responsible homes.

I believe it's crucial that today’s architects understand building science and design high-performance green buildings that acknowledge the climate, take advantage of local materials, and tap into the latest construction technologies. There are so many innovative materials coming to market, advancements in solar panels, 3D printing, smart home systems, and better construction practices.  Many US cities require that new buildings meet minimum energy efficiency standards.  Many architects and builders are specializing in net zero homes and building to passive house standards. 

Modernist architects had their agenda and their style reflected their goals. The irony is that if contemporary architects simply copy a modern style, they are being traditionalists, conforming to the attitudes of the past…. everything that modern architecture was vehemently against! 

what’s your architectural style?

Have you ever thought about the philosophical underpinnings of architectural styles?  Based on the ideologies and aesthetics described above, which architectural style resonates with you and your values?  Are you more modern or traditional in your thoughts, attitudes, and beliefs?  Or do you fall somewhere in between?  

How do you want to be perceived? How do you want to live?  What do you want to feel in your home? How do you intend to use spaces, entertain guests?  What degree of connection, openness, and privacy do you want?  These aspects and more are intertwined with the architectural style you choose. 

Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference and what makes you feel at home. The most important thing is that your home reflects who you are and serves its purpose in your life. After all, it's your home to make your own!